Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Timaeus and Critias
Timaeus and Critias | Plato
3 posts | 2 read | 1 to read
Timaeus and Critias is a Socratic dialogue in two parts. A response to an account of an ideal state told by Socrates, it begins with Timaeus’s theoretical exposition of the cosmos and his story describing the creation of the universe, from its very beginning to the coming of man. Timaeus introduces the idea of a creator God and speculates on the structure and composition of the physical world. Critias, the second part of Plato’s dialogue, comprises an account of the rise and fall of Atlantis, an ancient, mighty and prosperous empire ruled by the descendents of Poseidon, which ultimately sank into the sea.
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
Pick icon
100%
review
Bookwomble
post image
Pickpick

I mainly wanted to read Timaeus as it has the 1st literary reference to Atlantis, which myth I've long been fascinated by. It does start out with the lost city, but quickly moves on to the 1st Greek account of a creator being and Plato's conception of the physical universe (everything is made of triangles!). The incomplete Critias really delivers on Atlantis, being the 2nd part of a trilogy Plato didn't complete, and which annoyingly finishes mid-

blurb
Bookwomble
post image

For Lancashire, it's been stiflingly hot today at over 30°C. Spent the day with a bit of work, a bit of boardgaming with my son, a bit of reading, and a bit of bramble gin and tonic, which does make Plato more understandable. Trying to cool off as the clouds come in, with rumbles of thunder presaging an approaching storm. Actually, a nice summer's day - Hope you're all enjoying yours 😊

merelybookish Sounds pretty nice! 4y
21 likes1 stack add1 comment
blurb
TieDyeDude
post image

It's been ages since I've read any Plato, but, in researching my budding interest in the legend of Atlantis, I read that this contains the first literary mention of the city.
The intro was already very interesting, as it describes these works as departures from Plato's other dialogues, and a bit of a failed experiment as the words didn't yet exist to convey his intent. Should be a good challenge to read.