Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say about Their Lives
Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say about Their Lives | Leigh Gilmore
2 posts | 3 read | 6 to read
In 1991, Anita Hill brought testimony and scandal into America's living rooms during televised Senate confirmation hearings in which she detailed the sexual harassment she had suffered at the hands of Clarence Thomas. The male Senate Judiciary Committee refused to take Hill seriously and the veracity of Hill's claims were sullied in the mainstream media. Hill was defamed as "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty," and Thomas went on to be confirmed. The tainting of Hill and her testimony are part of a larger social history in which women find themselves caught up in a system that refuses to believe what they say. The Anita Hill case shows how a tainted witness is not who someone is, but what someone can become. Why are women so often considered unreliable witnesses to their own experience? How are women discredited in legal courts and in courts of public opinion? Why is women's testimony so often mired in controversies fueled by histories of slavery and colonialism? Tainted Witness takes up these questions within a rich archive, including Anita Hill's testimony as well as Rigoberta Mench?'s account of genocide in Guatemala; Jamaica Kincaid's literary witnessing in Autobiography of My Mother; and news coverage of such stories as Nafissatou Diallo's claim that Dominique Strauss-Kahn raped her. Bringing together legal, literary, and feminist frameworks, Leigh Gilmore provides provocative readings of what happens when women's testimony is discredited. Throughout, Gilmore demonstrates how testimony crosses jurisdictions, publics, and the unsteady line between truth and fiction in search of justice.
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
review
Schlinkles
Bailedbailed

I think I‘m fairly intelligent and I read voraciously but I absolutely could not wade through the academic writing in this book. It took me a couple of days to get through the 25 page introduction because I had to keep rereading sentences multiple times to make sense of them. An interesting premise for a book that failed on execution or least failed for me.

blurb
Schlinkles
post image

On to November‘s Feminist Book Club pick

20 likes3 stack adds