Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Stony Jack and the Lost Jewels of Cheapside
Stony Jack and the Lost Jewels of Cheapside: Treasure and Ghosts in the London Clay | Victoria Shepherd
3 posts | 1 read
A thrilling history of mudlarkers, charlatans, experts and chancers – the underbelly of the Edwardian antiques trade. 'What a story! And how skilfully told! A tale about treasure, as twisty and thrilling as any of the adventures of Indiana Jones.' Lucy Worsley June 1912. A pair of workmen deposit a heavy ball of clay in the antiques shop of George Fabian Lawrence, or ‘Stony Jack’ as he's better known. As Lawrence picks through the mud, a speck of gold catches his eye. A pearl earring tumbles into his hand, then another. A Burmese ruby follows; then Colombian emeralds, lapis lazuli from Afghanistan and turquoise from Iran; tankards; watches; topaz; amazonite. Stony Jack has discovered the greatest single cache of Elizabethan treasure. Diving into London’s bustling, sometimes lawless, antiques trade at the turn of the century, Victoria Shepherd provides a compelling portrait of the city at the height of empire. A thrilling ride through Edwardian London, from the marble halls of the British Museum to the East End's maze of tenements and alleyways, Stony Jack and the Lost Jewels of Cheapside oversees the transformation of the city into a modern metropolis.
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
review
shanaqui
Mehso-so

It was quite difficult at times to figure out what was fiction and what was fact in this book -- and a fairly egregious error when discussing Tutankhamun (because the author chose to mention Howard Carter a bunch, even though he is totally irrelevant to the Cheapside Hoard) makes me worry a bit about the author's actual scholarly ability.

It was an entertaining read, but... yeah. Concerns.

blurb
shanaqui

Oooooooof. Absolute howler here: "Now the world would know about the later kings of Egypt of the Eighteenth Dynasty, and Tutankhamun specifically, who, with his father, had reverted to the worship of one deity, Amun, the sun god, ending Egypt's long-standing polytheism."

How many errors can you fit in one run-on sentence????

shanaqui Akhenaten worshipped the Aten, very much NOT Amun. Polytheism in Egypt didn't end with his reign even remotely, and was REINSTATED by Tutankhamun, who was probably (but not certainly) Akhenaten's son. 2mo
lil1inblue @shanaqui Oof! Also, that sentence was insane to decipher to begin with! 2mo
Faranae Also, “reverted“ to monotheism? Converted, sure, insofar as founding a religion is converting to it. But reverted implies a previously existing monotheism, which we definitely don't have evidence for in ancient Egypt. 2mo
shanaqui @Faranae It's not a good sign for the author's scholarship at all. I didn't think it was *bad* up to now (bit rambly and off the point at times) but now I'm looking at everything with a raised eyebrow. 2mo
15 likes4 comments
blurb
shanaqui
post image

HMMM, d'you think I was in a bit of a reading mood today?

Though I didn't read much of this particular book. It's been intimidating me since I started it. But I made sure to make time for a chapter today, and that did hook my interest a bit better than the first chapters had. I know a little bit about the Cheapside Hoard, but no great detail.